From: mur@awite.de   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
   > What do you mean under nested rules?   
      
   I meant cascaded rule bases. The output of one rule base should be used   
   as input for the next without need of defuzzyfication. I am not sure, if   
   it is supported. Mabe it is supported in FFLL.   
      
   I didn't have a close look, because last time I missed some things,   
   which are part of level 2 of FCL and not included in FFLL, e.g.   
      
   OR in the condition   
   NOT in the (sub)condition   
   WITH for weighting rules   
      
   I know, I can work around this but it makes the rules less natural.   
   Users should be able to use "OR" and "NOT" as they do in the real world.   
      
      
   I have extended FCL for the case of   
   > intuitionistic logic. The compiler is ready, but I"m interested in   
   > proposals to make the language better.   
      
   I had not heard about it before. Could you provide an example?   
      
   Greetings   
      
   Ernst Murnleitner   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)