From: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de   
      
   On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:24:16 +0100, Ernst Murnleitner wrote:   
      
   >> But why shouldn't it be? Clearly, good language design should allow an   
   >> expression everywhere a constant is expected. The set aggregate   
   >> (false,0)(true.1) is a constant expression, so why not?   
   >   
   > I will only use syntax which is defined by FCL in order to beeing able   
   > to test a fuzzy system with different software.   
      
   Well, but it *is* FCL syntax. (false,0)(true.1) is "membership_function" as   
   defined on the page 18. Now, is there any good reason why   
   "membership_function" should not appear in operators AND, OR, XOR, NOT, IS?   
      
   --   
   Regards,   
   Dmitry A. Kazakov   
   http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)