XPost: alt.os.development   
   From: Ekrem.Saban@utanet.at   
      
   Yeahhhhh! I like that!!! :D :D :D   
      
      
   "Stefan Nobis"  schrieb im Newsbeitrag   
   news:87mzgtq7hy.fsf@snobis.de...   
   > "Dmitry A. Kazakov"  writes:   
   >   
   >>> Pure OO paradigm is great on paper and is hardly compatible with the   
   >>> real life.   
   >>> "The paper is smooth, but the real site has canyons".   
   >   
   >> So far nobody really tried, AFAIK.   
   >   
   > Hmmm... what about Plan9, NextStep (MacOS X)?   
   >   
   >> 1. There are technical and theoretical problems with OO languages.   
   >   
   [...]   
   > on facts and rational reasoning -- but that's bullshit. Even if   
   > managers would be very rational people (and I don't think so), they   
   > just can't make really good decisions, because (as we all know here   
   > :)), they just don't know all facts. So they decide based on UNCERTAIN   
   > KNOWLEDGE and I think at the moment we are sitting on a local extremum   
   > (but a very very bad one compared to the global maximum).   
   >   
   So, we are back at the uncertainty or possibility that is covered by fuzzy   
   sets!!!   
      
   But I am sure that we are not in an endless loop!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)