From: kirk@bytecraft.com   
      
   gaye.soykok@gmail.com wrote:   
   > Hi Kirk,   
   >   
   > In our case it is not the systems that are fuzzy actually. The flow   
   > of the code will be profiled in order to partition and depending on   
   > the attributes they exhibit, the architecture will be modified.   
      
   I gathered that; based on the literature I checked on HW/SW partition   
   I could see the interest in fuzzy as a method of implementation.   
      
   > The architecture is static however HW/SW is partitioned between   
   > processors and ASICs or/and FPGAs or processors and instruction set   
   > extensions. what do you use for that , if you dont mind my   
   > enthusiasm ?   
      
   The systems that our clients work on are often small enough that the   
   dividing line is chosen by the designer. Perhaps some use a more   
   formal approach; I'll have to start asking.   
      
   > For the rule base i have not implemented it yet however it would be   
   >  based on HW/SW partitioning basics. Like if the basic block is in   
   > a loop mark it as HW...etc etc..   
      
   That's the interesting part to me, and I think to comp.ai.fuzzy.   
      
   > I have checked the examples of Fuzzy_C.It seemed like it will take   
   > more of my time to define the rule database with it. Integration   
   > and the real_time efficacy would be better however. Thanks for   
   > suggestion anyway.   
      
   Fair enough. Good luck with your thesis.   
      
   Kirk.   
      
   --   
   Kirk Zurell   
   Byte Craft Limited   
   Waterloo, Ontario, Canada   
   http://www.bytecraft.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)