Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.fuzzy    |    Fuzzy logic... all warm and fuzzy-like    |    1,275 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 769 of 1,275    |
|    Dmitry A. Kazakov to Kirk Zurell    |
|    Re: fuzzy logic    |
|    07 Apr 08 22:02:38    |
      From: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de              On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:07:30 -0400, Kirk Zurell wrote:              > Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:              >> 3. Logic is not geometry. Though it is true that the equation x^2 + y^2 =       >> r^2 implies under certain conditions certain statements about axes of a       >> circle defined in a certain way. But it would be silly to expect fuzzy       >> logic to capture that. Same is true for crisp logic too. Neither is       >> geometry.       >       > Admittedly I was approaching the problem from our control       > background, looking at a circle as just another output waveform.              Well, but waveform is not a fuzzy curve in the sense of a fuzzy subset over       R^2. That is when you draw a curve with a soft pencil and them rub the       drawing a bit. (OK, that would be rather a random set, because it       distributes a fixed amount of graphite [i.e. the set measure is additive],       but I think you get the idea.)              >>> If we can't describe       >>> its qualities accurately in human linguistic terms, we might not       >>> be able to encode it in fuzzy logic.       >>       >> You do not need to describe a circle accurately. You can do it       >> inaccurately, that's the whole idea.       >       > Meant to say "operably" or similar. In the model I was using and       > failing with, there is only that curve: no information about,       > say, the forces that bring it into being.              Hmm, that should be simply to do. For this you could describe its as, say,              x = W cos (t)       y = H sin (t)              Considering W and H fuzzy, will give us a fuzzy shape. We could also       continue fuzzifying it by adding fuzzy phase like              x = W cos (t+P)       y = H sin (t)              where P is a fuzzy number around 0, or e fuzzy-valued function of t. etc.              But I think you have a different model in mind. Like a *crisp* curve which       is "almost" a circle or looks like a circle. This is a different construct.       Here the curves are crisp. Fuzzy is a subset of all possible crisp curves.       For each crisp curve the truth value tells how it is possible for the curve       to appear a circle.              That brings us bug to the issue - the model first.              --       Regards,       Dmitry A. Kazakov       http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca