From: SeaNymph@deepbluesea.com
On 2/12/2014 10:00 AM, Jax wrote:
> SeaNymph wrote in
> news:lde8t8$amd$3@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 2/11/2014 4:38 PM, Lab Lover wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:26:20 +0000 (UTC), Aardvark
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:23:13 -0800, Lab Lover wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:56:57 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> SeaNymph expressed precisely :
>>>>>>> On 2/11/2014 11:07 AM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:04:55 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It happens that Aardvark formulated :
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:10:37 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark laid this down on his screen :
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:34:21 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark formulated on Monday :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:18:50 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark submitted this idea :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:03:17 -0800, Lab Lover wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:55:09 +0000 (UTC), Aardvark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:46:42 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can you treat someone with civility when you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have no respect for them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lack of respect and civility aren't mutually exclusive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not long after I went on my crusade of addressing him with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> utmost civility and courtesy for all those months, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened to mention that I have no respect for him, nor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will I ever have any. For some reason, he took this as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being in some way either uncivil or discourteous.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind trying to explain the meaning behind those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two words you wrote above? For some reason, even mustering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up my greatest powers of articulateness, I've been unable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get him to understand their meaning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whut a croc of bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't take your stupidity out on me, please. It's *your*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupidity- take it out on yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try again dimmy, it's your stupidity getting in the way of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> being reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet I understand that lack of respect and civility aren't
>>>>>>>>>>>> mutually exclusive. I think you might like to do a re-think
>>>>>>>>>>>> there. That is, if you ever actually thought the first time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, that's not how I roll. No respect, no civility.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. I know you give no respect and certainly no civility.
>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless,
>>>>>>>>>> one *can* exist without the other. I proved it for months.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All you proved is how obnoxious and insulting you are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since when has addressing another poster civilly and with utmost
>>>>>>>> courtesy signify those things?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway- can you offer *one* single reason I should respect
>>>>>>>>>> someone like you? The fact that you constantly demand it not
>>>>>>>>>> being a reason, by the way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure, but you won't so why bother.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you can't think of a single thing to give me reason to respect
>>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm puzzled. If, as you seem to be saying, gaining my respect is
>>>>>>>> so important to you (the fact that you *don't* have it clearly
>>>>>>>> upsets you), then why do you behave towards me in such a way that
>>>>>>>> you don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of ever earning it?
>>>>>>>> You seriously need to go back to basics on your current strategy.
>>>>>>>> It sucks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need to be puzzled. The truth appears to be that none of this
>>>>>>> has anything to do with civility at all. For instance, there are
>>>>>>> those posters who see questions or requests for back up and/or
>>>>>>> clarification as attacks. Or, disagreeing with certain posters
>>>>>>> seems to mean to them that you aren't being nice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I said, it appears to have nothing to do with civility,
>>>>>>> something some simply do not understand. Its about control, about
>>>>>>> some posters wanting to control how others post. IOW, post in a
>>>>>>> manner that "I" (insert the nym of your choice here) find
>>>>>>> acceptable or I will label you discourteous and a liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Notice the high five routine, LL? Frick and frack on the attack.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the third parties would stop fueling the fire, I suspect you and
>>>>> Aardvark could reach a resolution quickly.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing to do with third parties. As I said earlier, it could all stop
>>>> tomorrow. I can easily ignore him and never refer to him. All he has
>>>> to do is stop humping my posts and try contributing on subject.
>>>
>>>
>>> I disagree, the third parties shoulder a great deal of responsibility
>>> in this, in my humble opinion.
>>>
>> Really? And who is the 3rd party? Would that be the poster that
>> attacks others, not because of things said to them but in so called
>> defense of their alleged friends?
>>
>> This is a stupid jenn tactic, block posters and then somehow try to
>> include them in your psycho babble.
>
> Aardvark... Jenn can't hear you. You're already blocked! Just saying. :)
>
Still can't follow a conversation or puzzle out who's posted what?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
