From: remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com
SeaNymph wrote in
news:ldg7no$6hv$8@dont-email.me:
> On 2/12/2014 10:00 AM, Jax wrote:
>> SeaNymph wrote in
>> news:lde8t8$amd$3@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On 2/11/2014 4:38 PM, Lab Lover wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:26:20 +0000 (UTC), Aardvark
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:23:13 -0800, Lab Lover wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:56:57 -0800, Eagle
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SeaNymph expressed precisely :
>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2014 11:07 AM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:04:55 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It happens that Aardvark formulated :
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:10:37 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark laid this down on his screen :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:34:21 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark formulated on Monday :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:18:50 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark submitted this idea :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:03:17 -0800, Lab Lover wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:55:09 +0000 (UTC), Aardvark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:46:42 -0800, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can you treat someone with civility when you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have no respect for them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lack of respect and civility aren't mutually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exclusive.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely true.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not long after I went on my crusade of addressing him
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with utmost civility and courtesy for all those months,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I happened to mention that I have no respect for him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nor will I ever have any. For some reason, he took this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as being in some way either uncivil or discourteous.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you mind trying to explain the meaning behind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those two words you wrote above? For some reason, even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mustering up my greatest powers of articulateness, I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been unable to get him to understand their meaning.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whut a croc of bullshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't take your stupidity out on me, please. It's *your*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stupidity- take it out on yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try again dimmy, it's your stupidity getting in the way of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being reasonable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet I understand that lack of respect and civility
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aren't mutually exclusive. I think you might like to do a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-think there. That is, if you ever actually thought the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, that's not how I roll. No respect, no civility.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. I know you give no respect and certainly no civility.
>>>>>>>>>>> Nevertheless, one *can* exist without the other. I proved it
>>>>>>>>>>> for months.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All you proved is how obnoxious and insulting you are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since when has addressing another poster civilly and with utmost
>>>>>>>>> courtesy signify those things?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway- can you offer *one* single reason I should respect
>>>>>>>>>>> someone like you? The fact that you constantly demand it not
>>>>>>>>>>> being a reason, by the way.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure, but you won't so why bother.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So you can't think of a single thing to give me reason to
>>>>>>>>> respect you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm puzzled. If, as you seem to be saying, gaining my respect is
>>>>>>>>> so important to you (the fact that you *don't* have it clearly
>>>>>>>>> upsets you), then why do you behave towards me in such a way
>>>>>>>>> that you don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of ever earning
>>>>>>>>> it? You seriously need to go back to basics on your current
>>>>>>>>> strategy. It sucks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need to be puzzled. The truth appears to be that none of this
>>>>>>>> has anything to do with civility at all. For instance, there are
>>>>>>>> those posters who see questions or requests for back up and/or
>>>>>>>> clarification as attacks. Or, disagreeing with certain posters
>>>>>>>> seems to mean to them that you aren't being nice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I said, it appears to have nothing to do with civility,
>>>>>>>> something some simply do not understand. Its about control,
>>>>>>>> about some posters wanting to control how others post. IOW, post
>>>>>>>> in a manner that "I" (insert the nym of your choice here) find
>>>>>>>> acceptable or I will label you discourteous and a liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Notice the high five routine, LL? Frick and frack on the attack.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the third parties would stop fueling the fire, I suspect you and
>>>>>> Aardvark could reach a resolution quickly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing to do with third parties. As I said earlier, it could all
>>>>> stop tomorrow. I can easily ignore him and never refer to him. All
>>>>> he has to do is stop humping my posts and try contributing on
>>>>> subject.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I disagree, the third parties shoulder a great deal of responsibility
>>>> in this, in my humble opinion.
>>>>
>>> Really? And who is the 3rd party? Would that be the poster that
>>> attacks others, not because of things said to them but in so called
>>> defense of their alleged friends?
>>>
>>> This is a stupid jenn tactic, block posters and then somehow try to
>>> include them in your psycho babble.
>>
>> Aardvark... Jenn can't hear you. You're already blocked! Just saying.
>> :)
>>
> Still can't follow a conversation or puzzle out who's posted what?
Linda what are you doing posting your reply to another newgroup? Just
wondering!
--
Jax :)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
