From: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de   
      
   On 2019-01-20 14:56, Manuel Rodriguez wrote:   
   > Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2019 13:29:31 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov:   
   >> Note that the probability theory was in its turn considered   
   >> pseudo-science because it was formulated in its own terms.   
   >   
   > The term protoscience is used for a discipline not accepted as a valid   
   > discipline right now which implies that things will change in the   
   > future. Threating everything as protoscience is equal to anything goes   
   > and this blurres the borderline between valid and invalid. I wouldn't use   
   > the term protoscience for fuzzy logic, i would call the discipline pseudo-   
   > or fake science because Fuzzy theory has gone in the wrong direction.   
      
   "All science is either physics or stamp collecting."   
      
       -- Ernest Rutherford   
      
   > Around 1 million papers are published about the topic in Google   
   > Scholar. This is not a sign how well Fuzzy logic works, but it shows   
   > that Google Scholar has a quality problem.   
      
   As if Google were a credible source in the light of permanent scandals.   
      
   > The crawling robot has indexed   
   > too much predatory journals and it would be nice, if Google removes the   
   > fuzzy journals from the index, as some kind of spring cleaning.   
      
   What any scientific community needs least is filtering of information by   
   self imposed corporate censors...   
      
   --   
   Regards,   
   Dmitry A. Kazakov   
   http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)