Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,258 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions:    |
|    14 Mar 24 17:54:24    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic       From: polcott2@gmail.com              On 3/14/2024 5:01 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 3/14/24 12:01 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 3/14/2024 11:58 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:       >>> On 03/13/2024 10:20 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>> On 3/13/2024 1:16 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:       >>>>> On 03/12/2024 09:00 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>> On 3/12/2024 10:49 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:       >>>>>>> On 03/12/2024 08:23 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:       >>>>>>>> On 03/12/2024 07:52 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 9:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 4:31 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 6:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 3:53 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 5:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 2:34 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 4:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 1:11 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 2:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/24 12:02 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2024 1:31 PM, immibis wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/03/24 19:12, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ∀ H ∈ Turing_Machine_Deciders       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ∃ TMD ∈ Turing_Machine_Descriptions |       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Predicted_Behavior(H, TMD) != Actual_Behavior(TMD)       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is some input TMD to every H such that       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Predicted_Behavior(H, TMD) != Actual_Behavior(TMD)       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it can be a different TMD to each H.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When we disallow decider/input pairs that are       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions where both YES and NO are the wrong answer       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once we understand that either YES or NO is the right       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer, the whole rebuttal is tossed out as invalid and       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqy       ∞ // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> halts       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢*       Ĥ.Hqn // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not halt       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BOTH YES AND NO ARE THE WRONG ANSWER FOR EVERY Ĥ.H       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, because a given H will only go to one of the answers.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THAT       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be wrong, and the other one right.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ∀ H ∈ Turing_Machine_Deciders       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ∃ TMD ∈ Turing_Machine_Descriptions |       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Predicted_Behavior(H, TMD) != Actual_Behavior(TMD)       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not exactly. A pair of otherwise identical machines that       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (that are contained within the above specified set)       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only differ by return value will both be wrong on the       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same pathological input.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean a pair of DIFFERENT machines. Any difference is       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every decider/input pair (referenced in the above set) has a       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding decider/input pair that only differs by the       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> value of its decider.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> ∀ H ∈ Turing_Machines_Returning_Boolean       >>>>>>>>>>>>> ∃ TMD ∈ Turing_Machine_Descriptions |       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Predicted_Behavior(H, TMD) != Actual_Behavior(TMD)       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> Every H/TMD pair (referenced in the above set) has a       >>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding H/TMD pair that only differs by the return       >>>>>>>>>>>>> value of its Boolean_TM.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> That isn't in the set above.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> That both of these H/TMD pairs get the wrong answer proves       >>>>>>>>>>>>> that       >>>>>>>>>>>>> their question was incorrect because the opposite answer to       >>>>>>>>>>>>> the       >>>>>>>>>>>>> same question is also proven to be incorrect.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Nope, since both aren't in the set selected.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> When they are deciders that must get the correct answer both       >>>>>>>>>>> of them are not in the set.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> *IF* they are correct decider.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> WHen we select from all Turing Machine Deciders, there is no       >>>>>>>>>> requirement that any of them get any particular answer right.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> So, ALL deciders are in the set that we cycle through and       >>>>>>>>>> apply the       >>>>>>>>>> following logic to ALL of them.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Each is them paired with an input that it will get wrong, and the       >>>>>>>>>> existance of the input was what as just proven, the ^ template       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> When they are Turing_Machines_Returning_Boolean the this       >>>>>>>>>>> set inherently includes identical pairs that only differ       >>>>>>>>>>> by return value.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> But in the step of select and input that they will get wrong,       >>>>>>>>>> they       >>>>>>>>>> will be givne DIFFERENT inputs.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> You just don't understand what that statement is saying.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> I've expalined it, but it seems over you head.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> No the problem is that you are not paying attention.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> No, you keep on making STUPID mistakes, like thinking that       >>>>>>>>>> select a       >>>>>>>>>> input that the machine will get wrong needs to be the same for       >>>>>>>>>> two       >>>>>>>>>> differnt machines.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> For Every H, we show we can find at least one input (chosen       >>>>>>>>>>>> just for       >>>>>>>>>>>> that machine) that it will get wrong.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> When we use machine templates then we can see instances of       >>>>>>>>>>> the same machine that only differs by return value where both       >>>>>>>>>>> get the wrong answer on the same input. By same input I mean       >>>>>>>>>>> the same finite string of numerical values.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> But if they returned differnt values, they will have different       >>>>>>>>>> descriptions.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> Otherwise, how could a UTM get the right answer, since it only       >>>>>>>>>> gets       >>>>>>>>>> the description.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> We can get around all of this stuff by simply using this criteria:       >>>>>>>>> Date 10/13/2022 11:29:23 AM       >>>>>>>>> *MIT Professor Michael Sipser agreed this verbatim paragraph is              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca