XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   _DDD()   
   [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping   
   [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping   
   [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD   
   [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)   
   [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04   
   [00002182] 5d               pop ebp   
   [00002183] c3               ret   
   Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]   
      
   Sufficient knowledge of the x86 language conclusively proves   
   that the call from DDD correctly emulated by HHH to HHH(DDD)   
   cannot possibly return for any pure function HHH.   
      
      
        If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D   
        until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never   
        stop running unless aborted then   
      
        H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D   
        specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.   
      
      
   (a) HHH determines that it must abort DDD   
   (b) HHH reports that DDD will not stop unless aborted   
   (c) HHH aborts its simulation of DDD   
      
   If HHH reported that it did not need to abort DDD before HHH   
   aborts DDD this is like you need groceries and report that   
   you do not need groceries before you got more groceries: a lie.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)