XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/13/2024 12:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 7/13/24 12:43 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 7/13/2024 11:31 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>> On 7/13/24 12:19 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>> On 7/13/2024 11:05 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>> On 7/13/24 11:34 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 7/13/2024 10:25 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 7/13/24 11:15 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In other words when you are very hungry you have the   
   >>>>>>>> free will to decide that you are not hungry at all   
   >>>>>>>> and never eat anything ever again with no ill effects   
   >>>>>>>> to your health what-so-ever.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Just shows that though I have free will, I am also in a Universe   
   >>>>>>> with a lot of determinism.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Try and use this free will to make a square circle.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Nope, just shows you don't know what you are talking about and   
   >>>>>>> need to switch to Red Herring because you lost the argument.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Face it, all you have proved is that you are nothing but a   
   >>>>>>> pathetic ignorant pathological lying idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> After HHH has already aborted its simulation of DDD   
   >>>>>>>>>> and returns to the DDD that called it is not the same   
   >>>>>>>>>> behavior as DDD simulated by HHH that must be aborted.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Right, and the question is about the behavior of DDD,   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> the input finite string not an external process that HHH   
   >>>>>>>> has no access to.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Right, but the program it represents, and the question is about IS.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> HHH cannot be correctly required to report on the behavior   
   >>>>>> of an external process that it has no access to.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> But it has access to the complete representation of it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In other words you are still hungry AFTER you filled   
   >>>> yourself with food BECAUSE you are the same person   
   >>>> thus the change in process state DOES NOT MATTER.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Maybe you need to stop eating so much Herring with Red Sauce, and   
   >>> focus on some of the errors pointed out in your logic rather than   
   >>> just ignoring them, which, in effect, just admitss that you have no   
   >>> idea how to get out of your lies.   
   >>   
   >> You continue to stupidly insist that DDD specifies   
   >> the same behavior before its simulation has been   
   >> aborted than after it simulation has been aborted.   
   >   
   > And you think that HHH partial observation of the some of the behavior   
   > of DDD affects it.   
   >   
      
   No stupid you know that I didn't say anything like that.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)