XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/29/2024 2:18 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:   
   > Op 29.jul.2024 om 16:07 schreef olcott:   
   >> HHH(Infinite_Recursion) and HHH(DDD) show the same non-halting   
   >> behavior pattern in their derived execution traces of their   
   >> inputs.   
   >>   
   >> Correct emulation is defined as emulating the machine language   
   >> input according to the x86 semantics specified by this input.   
   >>   
   >> For DDD correctly emulated by HHH this includes HHH emulating   
   >> itself emulating DDD according to the x86 semantics of itself.   
   >>   
   >> HHH(DDD) shows the exact same execution trace behavior pattern   
   >> as HHH(Infinite_Recursion) where 3-4 instructions are repeated   
   >> with no conditional branch instructions in this trace that could   
   >> prevent them from endlessly repeating.   
   >>   
   >> void Infinite_Recursion()   
   >> {   
   >>    Infinite_Recursion();   
   >> }   
   >   
   > No, the HHH that aborts after N cycles has a similar behaviour as   
   >   
      
   So you don't even know that infinite recursion is non-halting behavior.   
   You can go back and try again on this same post I am not looking at   
   anything else that you say.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)