Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,252 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,364 of 59,252    |
|    don to All    |
|    Newsom vetoes controversial California A    |
|    30 Sep 24 14:06:46    |
      XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.freespeech, sac.politics       XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: donhasheider@linuxmail.org              California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sunday vetoed a landmark artificial       intelligence bill that was designed to have first-in-the-nation safety       regulations against AI misuse.              The big picture: Backers of the bill that would've required AI       developers to comply with certain rules before developing models had       argued it would provide safety with workable provisions at a time when       Congress has stalled on the matter and the EU has taken a lead in       regulating the sector.              The bill had divided the tech industry. The likes of Google, Meta and       OpenAI opposed it amid concerns that it might hamper innovation and       Anthropic and Elon Musk cautiously supported it.              Driving the news: Newsom said in returning Senate Bill 1047 without his       signature that while SB 1047 was "well-intentioned," it didn't take into       account "whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments,       involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data."              Instead, he said "the bill applies stringent standards to even the most       basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it. I do not believe       this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats       posed by the technology."       What we're watching: Newsom said in an emailed statement announcing his       veto that he's working with the "godmother of AI," Fei-Fei Li and other       leading researchers and industry leaders on California's efforts "to       develop responsible guardrails for the deployment" of generative AI.              This will focus on "developing an empirical, science-based trajectory       analysis of frontier models and their capabilities and attendant risks,"       per Newsom, who said he'll "continue to work with the Legislature on       this critical matter during its next session."       What they're saying: Google in an emailed statement Sunday thanked       Newsom "for helping California continue to lead in building responsible       AI tools" and said it looked forward to "working with the Governor's       responsible AI initiative and the federal government on creating       appropriate safeguards and developing tools that help everyone."              OpenAI said in an emailed statement Sunday that the company appreciated       Newsom's "commitment to maintaining California's role as a global leader       in AI innovation, and look forward to working with him and state       lawmakers in well-defined areas of public interest such as deepfakes,       child safety, and AI literacy."       Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said on X Sunday that "AI       springs from California" as she thanked Newsom "for recognizing the       opportunity and responsibility we all share to enable small       entrepreneurs and academia — not big tech — to dominate."       The other side: Scott Wiener, a state senator from San Francisco who       authored the bill in California's Senate, said in a statement Sunday the       veto represented a "missed opportunity for California to once again lead       on innovative tech regulation — just as we did around data privacy and       net neutrality — and we are all less safe as a result."              Nonprofit Accountable Tech in an emailed statement Sunday called       Newsom's veto "a massive giveaway to Big Tech companies and an affront       to all Americans who are currently the unconsenting guinea pigs of an       unregulated and untested" AI industry.       "This veto will not 'empower innovation' — it only further entrenches       the status quo where Big Tech monopolies are allowed to rake in profits       without regard for our safety, even as their AI tools are already       threatening democracy, civil rights, and the environment with unknown       potential for other catastrophic harms," it added.       Editor's note: This article has been updated with more details from       California Gov. Gavin Newsom's announcement. Axios' Ina Fried       contributed reporting.              https://www.axios.com/2024/09/30/california-ai-safety-bill-governor-newsom-veto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca