XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/17/2024 2:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 11/17/24 1:36 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> void DDD()   
   >> {   
   >>    HHH(DDD);   
   >>    return;   
   >> }   
   >>   
   >> _DDD()   
   >> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping   
   >> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping   
   >> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD   
   >> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)   
   >> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04   
   >> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp   
   >> [00002183] c3         ret   
   >> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]   
   >>   
   >> DDD emulated by any encoding of HHH that emulates N   
   >> to infinity number of steps of DDD cannot possibly   
   >> reach its "return" instruction final halt state.   
   >>   
   >> This applies to every DDD emulated by any HHH no   
   >> matter the recursive depth of emulation. Thus it is   
   >> a verified fact that the input to HHH never halts.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > I will also add, that since you have dropped your requirements on HHH   
   > (or are seeming to try to divorse yourself from previous assumptions)   
   > there are MANY HHH that can complete the emulation, they just fail to be   
   > "pure functions".   
   >   
      
   The damned liar despicably dishonest attempt to get away   
   with changing the subject away from DDD reaching its final   
   halt state.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)