home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.ai.philosophy      Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this      59,235 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 57,427 of 59,235   
   olcott to Richard Damon   
   Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from i   
   19 Nov 24 21:25:35   
   
   XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/19/2024 5:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 11/19/24 9:44 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 11/19/2024 5:56 AM, joes wrote:   
   >>> Am Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:21:04 -0600 schrieb olcott:   
   >>>> On 11/18/2024 1:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>> On 11/18/24 2:07 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 11/18/2024 1:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 11/18/24 1:41 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On 11/18/2024 10:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 11:04 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 9:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 9:47 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 8:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 8:46 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 4:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 4:30 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 2:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 1:36 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is just what YOU are doing, as "Halting" and what a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Program" is are DEFINED, and you can't change it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> YET ANOTHER STUPID LIE.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A SMART LIAR WOULD NEVER SAY THAT I MEANT PROGRAM WHEN I   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALWAYS SPECIFIED A C FUNCTION.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> But then you can talk about "emulation" or x86 semantics, as   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> both of those are operations done on PROGRAMS.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> No stupid I provided a published paper that includes the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> termination analysis of C functions.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Look again at what they process. C functions that include all   
   >>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> functions they call.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> You stupidly claimed termination analysis is only done on   
   >>>>>>>>>> programs. I proved that you were stupidly wrong on pages 24-27 of   
   >>>>>>>>>> the PDF of this paper.   
   >>>>>>>>>> Automated Termination Analysis of C Programs   
   >>>>>>>>>> https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/972440/   
   >>>>>>>>>> files/972440.pdf   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The problem here is you are mixing language between domains.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I said the termination analysis applies to C functions you said   
   >>>>>>>> that   
   >>>>>>>> it does not. No weasel words around it YOU WERE WRONG!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Termination analysis applies to FUNCTIONS, FULL FUNCTIONS, ones that   
   >>>>>>> include everything that is part of them. Those things, in   
   >>>>>>> computation   
   >>>>>>> theory, are called PROGRAMS.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The top of PDF page 24 are not programs defection for brains.   
   >>>>>> https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/972440/files/972440.pdf   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Those *ARE* "Computation Theory" Programs.   
   >>>>> They are also  LEAF functions, unlike your DDD.   
   >>>>> NOTHING in that paper (form what I can see) talks about handling non-   
   >>>>> leaf-functions with including all the code in the routines it calls.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Since the halting problem is defined to have the input call its own   
   >>>> termination analyzer and the termination analyzer is itself required to   
   >>>> halt then any sequence of this input that would prevent it from halting   
   >>>> IS A NON-HALTING SEQUENCE THAT MUST BE ABORTED AND CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO   
   >>>> CONTINUE.   
   >>> What happens when we run HHH(HHH)?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> The ONLY thing that it relevant is that DDD emulated by   
   >> HHH according to the semantics of the x86 language specifies   
   >> that HHH must emulate itself emulating DDD and   
   >   
   > No, that is IRRELEVENT as it isn't a proper question to ask a decider.   
   >   
      
   It has been the correct question to ask a simulating halt decider   
   for more than two years now. My treatment for cancer will be every   
   day for a year beginning next week.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca