Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,427 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from i    |
|    19 Nov 24 21:25:35    |
      XPost: comp.theory       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 11/19/2024 5:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 11/19/24 9:44 AM, olcott wrote:       >> On 11/19/2024 5:56 AM, joes wrote:       >>> Am Mon, 18 Nov 2024 14:21:04 -0600 schrieb olcott:       >>>> On 11/18/2024 1:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>> On 11/18/24 2:07 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>> On 11/18/2024 1:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>> On 11/18/24 1:41 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>> On 11/18/2024 10:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 11:04 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 9:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 9:47 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 8:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 8:46 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 4:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 4:30 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/2024 2:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/17/24 1:36 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is just what YOU are doing, as "Halting" and what a       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Program" is are DEFINED, and you can't change it.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> YET ANOTHER STUPID LIE.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A SMART LIAR WOULD NEVER SAY THAT I MEANT PROGRAM WHEN I       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALWAYS SPECIFIED A C FUNCTION.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> But then you can talk about "emulation" or x86 semantics, as       >>>>>>>>>>>>> both of those are operations done on PROGRAMS.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> No stupid I provided a published paper that includes the       >>>>>>>>>>>> termination analysis of C functions.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Look again at what they process. C functions that include all       >>>>>>>>>>> the       >>>>>>>>>>> functions they call.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> You stupidly claimed termination analysis is only done on       >>>>>>>>>> programs. I proved that you were stupidly wrong on pages 24-27 of       >>>>>>>>>> the PDF of this paper.       >>>>>>>>>> Automated Termination Analysis of C Programs       >>>>>>>>>> https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/972440/       >>>>>>>>>> files/972440.pdf       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> The problem here is you are mixing language between domains.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I said the termination analysis applies to C functions you said       >>>>>>>> that       >>>>>>>> it does not. No weasel words around it YOU WERE WRONG!       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Termination analysis applies to FUNCTIONS, FULL FUNCTIONS, ones that       >>>>>>> include everything that is part of them. Those things, in       >>>>>>> computation       >>>>>>> theory, are called PROGRAMS.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> The top of PDF page 24 are not programs defection for brains.       >>>>>> https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/972440/files/972440.pdf       >>>>>>       >>>>> Those *ARE* "Computation Theory" Programs.       >>>>> They are also LEAF functions, unlike your DDD.       >>>>> NOTHING in that paper (form what I can see) talks about handling non-       >>>>> leaf-functions with including all the code in the routines it calls.       >>>>>       >>>> Since the halting problem is defined to have the input call its own       >>>> termination analyzer and the termination analyzer is itself required to       >>>> halt then any sequence of this input that would prevent it from halting       >>>> IS A NON-HALTING SEQUENCE THAT MUST BE ABORTED AND CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO       >>>> CONTINUE.       >>> What happens when we run HHH(HHH)?       >>>       >>       >> The ONLY thing that it relevant is that DDD emulated by       >> HHH according to the semantics of the x86 language specifies       >> that HHH must emulate itself emulating DDD and       >       > No, that is IRRELEVENT as it isn't a proper question to ask a decider.       >              It has been the correct question to ask a simulating halt decider       for more than two years now. My treatment for cancer will be every       day for a year beginning next week.              --       Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca