XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, comp.lang.c   
   From: richard@damon-family.org   
      
   olcott  wrote:   
   > On 12/6/2024 8:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >> On 12/6/24 9:08 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>> On 12/5/2024 11:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:   
   >>>> Am 05.12.2024 um 05:20 schrieb olcott:   
   >>>>> There is an 80% chance that I will be alive in one month.   
   >>>>> There may be an extended pause in my comments.   
   >>>>> I will try to bring a computer to the out of town hospital.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Maybe you'll solve your halting problem issues before you die.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> typedef void (*ptr)();   
   >>> int HHH(ptr P);   
   >>>   
   >>> int DD()   
   >>> {   
   >>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);   
   >>>    if (Halt_Status)   
   >>>      HERE: goto HERE;   
   >>>    return Halt_Status;   
   >>> }   
   >>>   
   >>> int main()   
   >>> {   
   >>>    HHH(DD);   
   >>> }   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I am sure that DD correctly emulated by HHH according to   
   >>> the semantics of the C programming language cannot possibly   
   >>> reach its own return instruction final halt state.   
   >>   
   >> How does HHH correctly emulated DD, if it isn't give tne code for the   
   >> HHH that DD calls?   
   >>   
   >   
   > As I have told you many dozens of times HHH and DD share   
   > the same global memory space within memory version of the   
   > Halt7.obj file.   
   >   
      
   And thus you admit that your HHH isn’t the required “pure function” as   
   its   
   result is dependent on that contents of that global memory, and not just   
   its input, as required by the definition of a global function,   
      
   Thus, your entire proof is just a LIE.   
      
   If you remove the requirement in your logic of HHH being a global function,   
   then I have previously shown an HHH that CAN emulate its input to that   
   final return, and thus refuting your claim.   
      
   All you have done is just prove that you are nothing but an ignorant liar   
   that doesn’t know what his words mean, and who refuse to learn, thus   
   removing the defense of it just being a honest mistake.   
      
   No, you are just showing how utterly STUPID and DISHONEST you have been in   
   your claims and arguments.   
      
   Sorry, but that it just the facts, facts you are just too stupid to   
   understand.   
      
      
   > _DD()   
   > [0000213e] 55             push ebp   
   > [0000213f] 8bec           mov ebp,esp   
   > [00002141] 51             push ecx   
   > [00002142] 683e210000     push 0000213e   
   > [00002147] e8a2f4ffff     call 000015ee ; *call HHH in global memory*   
   > [0000214c] 83c404         add esp,+04   
   > [0000214f] 8945fc         mov [ebp-04],eax   
   > [00002152] 837dfc00       cmp dword [ebp-04],+00   
   > [00002156] 7402           jz 0000215a   
   > [00002158] ebfe           jmp 00002158   
   > [0000215a] 8b45fc         mov eax,[ebp-04]   
   > [0000215d] 8be5           mov esp,ebp   
   > [0000215f] 5d             pop ebp   
   > [00002160] c3             ret   
   > Size in bytes:(0035) [00002160]   
   >   
   > Line 1354 called on line 1388   
   > https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)