XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: richard@damon-family.org   
      
   On 7/17/25 2:01 PM, olcott wrote:   
   > Claude.ai agrees that the halting problem as defined is a   
   > category error.   
   >   
   > https://claude.ai/share/0b784d2a-447e-441f-b3f0-a204fa17135a   
   >   
   > This can only be directly seen within my notion of a   
   > simulating halt decider. I used the Linz proof as my basis.   
   >   
   > Sorrowfully Peter Linz passed away 2 days less than   
   > one year ago on my Mom's birthday July 19, 2024.   
   >   
      
   BUT YOU LIED TO IT, AND THUS THE RESULTS ARE INVALID.   
      
   Requires Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ to report on the   
   direct execution of Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ and thus not   
   ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ correctly simulated by Ĥ.embedded_H.   
      
      
   There is NO requirement that embedded_H does a "Correct Simulation" as   
   what defines the behaviof of the input.   
      
   You have admitted that, as you say it MUST be allowed to abort, and   
   aborted simulation are not "correct" per the definitions.   
      
   Sorry, you are just showing you only have natural stupidity as you don't   
   even understand the rules of Artificial Intelegence.   
      
   Ultimately, the problem is that you are just to stupid to understand the   
   full power of the concept of representation.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)