[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> decider references.   
   >> * Place Flibble’s original insight into context as a precursor.   
   >>   
   >> Would you like help drafting that or summarizing your argument more   
   >> formally for such a write-up?   
   >   
   > Claude.ai understands that I have conclusively proven there   
   > is a category error in the problem definition. It is more   
   > effective reading the full dialogue than seeing my summary of it.   
   >   
   > https://claude.ai/share/5c251a20-4e76-457d-a624-3948f90cfbca   
   >   
      
   No, it just isn't smart enough to detect that you lied to it.   
      
   Sorry, all you are doing is proving that you are Naturally Stupid and   
   don't understand what you are talking about and don't care about it, and   
   that you can confuse AIs with your lies.   
      
   Since AIs are not programmed to try to find truth, but only something   
   that the quesitioner would like to hear, that isn't that hard to do.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)