Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,547 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to wij    |
|    Re: Four Chatbots figure out on their ow    |
|    19 Jul 25 14:47:30    |
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/19/2025 2:29 PM, wij wrote:   
   > On Sat, 2025-07-19 at 14:19 -0500, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 7/19/2025 12:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   >>> On 7/19/25 10:42 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>> On 7/18/2025 3:49 AM, joes wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> That is wrong. It is, as you say, very obvious that HHH cannot simulate   
   >>>>> DDD past the call to HHH. You just draw the wrong conclusion from it.   
   >>>>> (Aside: what "seems" to you will convince no one. You can just call   
   >>>>> everybody dishonest. Also, they are not "your reviewers".)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> For the purposes of this discussion this is the   
   >>>> 100% complete definition of HHH. It is the exact   
   >>>> same one that I give to all the chat bots.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until   
   >>>> it detects a non-terminating behavior pattern. When   
   >>>> HHH detects such a pattern it aborts its simulation   
   >>>> and returns 0.   
   >>>   
   >>> So, the only HHH that meets your definition is the HHH that never   
   >>> detects the pattern and aborts, and thus never returns.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> All of the Chat bots conclude that HHH(DDD) is correct   
   >> to reject its input as non-halting because this input   
   >> specified recursive simulation. They figure this out   
   >> on their own without any prompting.   
   >>   
   >> https://chatgpt.com/share/687aa4c2-b814-8011-9e7d-b85c03b291eb   
   >   
   > It is still nothing to do with the Halting Problem proof (Because it is POOH)   
   >   
      
   It is a key element of my refutation of this proof   
   because HHH also correctly determines that HHH(DD)==0.   
      
   DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly ever   
   reach past its first statement because it specifies   
   recursive simulation.   
      
   int DD()   
   {   
    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);   
    if (Halt_Status)   
    HERE: goto HERE;   
    return Halt_Status;   
   }   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca