Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,599 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Richard Heathfield    |
|    Re: Title: A Structural Analysis of the     |
|    21 Jul 25 08:33:07    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 7/21/2025 3:09 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:       > On 20/07/2025 17:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:       >> Do you really think that for such a simple problem, known and       >> understood by millions over nearly a century, any flaw would       >> not have already been found long ago?       >       > You're right, of course, but the above argument is not as robust       > as we might hope.       >       > "The number of human chromosomes was published by Painter in       > 1923. By inspection through a microscope, he counted 24 pairs of       > chromosomes, giving 48 in total. His error was copied by others,       > and it was not until 1956 that the true number (46) was       > determined by Indonesian-born cytogeneticist Joe Hin Tjio."       >       > And oscillating reactions were known to be impossible for quite a       > while even after crank Belousov came up with one.       >       > And of course there's another problem:       >       >> Do you really think that for such a simple problem, known and       >> understood by millions over nearly a century, any flaw would       >> not have already been found long ago?       >       > Yes. That's /precisely/ what he really thinks. And he always will, no       > matter what we tell him.       >              Because my reasoning is sound and every rebuttal       either denied verified facts or changed the words       that I said and rebutted these changed words. No       one can find any example of any error in the gist       of anything that I have been saying.              I did have a few typos here and there.              Joes tries to keep getting away with saying that       HHH cannot possibly simulate itself simulating DDD.       Richard almost always uses the strawman error.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca