Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,626 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: The halting problem as defined is a     |
|    22 Jul 25 22:13:29    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 7/22/2025 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 7/22/25 9:56 AM, olcott wrote:       >> On 7/22/2025 5:51 AM, Mikko wrote:       >>> On 2025-07-21 14:07:27 +0000, olcott said:       >>>       >>>> On 7/21/2025 4:38 AM, Mikko wrote:       >>>>> On 2025-07-20 15:04:34 +0000, olcott said:       >>>>>       >>>>>> On 7/20/2025 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote:       >>>>>>> On 2025-07-19 14:59:41 +0000, olcott said:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> On 7/19/2025 4:02 AM, Mikko wrote:       >>>>>>>>> On 2025-07-18 22:11:50 +0000, Mr Flibble said:       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:01:31 -0500, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Claude.ai agrees that the halting problem as defined is a       >>>>>>>>>>> category       >>>>>>>>>>> error.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> https://claude.ai/share/0b784d2a-447e-441f-b3f0-a204fa17135a       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> This can only be directly seen within my notion of a       >>>>>>>>>>> simulating halt       >>>>>>>>>>> decider. I used the Linz proof as my basis.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Sorrowfully Peter Linz passed away 2 days less than one year       >>>>>>>>>>> ago on my       >>>>>>>>>>> Mom's birthday July 19, 2024.       >>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>> I was the first to state that the halting problem as defined       >>>>>>>>>> is a category       >>>>>>>>>> error and I stated it in this forum.       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>> Indeed you stated that but failed to identify the actual error.       >>>>>>>>> You       >>>>>>>>> did not say which word in the problem statement is wrong or       >>>>>>>>> what is       >>>>>>>>> the wrong category or what would be the right one.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> I conclusively proved the actual category error yet       >>>>>>>> people that are only interested in rebuttal want no       >>>>>>>> part of any proof that I am correct.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> Is it the same error as Flibble found?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Flibble's category error is stated abstractly.       >>>>>> My version is stated concretely.       >>>>>       >>>>> Could you post a pointer to your version?       >>>>       >>>> The category error is a type mismatch error where       >>>> a Turing Machine decider is required to report on       >>>> the behavior of a directly executed machine yet       >>>> cannot take a directly executed machine as an input.       >>>       >>> That is not a category error. A category error is a word or phrase       >>> of some category in a context that requires a word or phrase of a       >>> different category.       >>>       >>       >> The category error is the mistake of assuming that       >> a directly executing Turing machine is in the category       >> of input to a Turing machine halt decider.       >       > How is that a category error, when it is EXACTLY the category of things       > that are supposed to be give (via representation) to it.       >              You don't really care so I won't bother to explain it again.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca