Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,652 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: Title: A Structural Analysis of the     |
|    25 Jul 25 14:50:25    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 7/25/2025 1:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 7/25/25 1:31 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 7/25/2025 12:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>> On 7/25/25 10:43 AM, olcott wrote:       >>>> On 7/25/2025 8:56 AM, Mr Flibble wrote:       >>>>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:58:34 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>> No, you have just been too stupid to see your error and to morally       >>>>>> corrupt to admit it.       >>>>>       >>>>> Yet another ad hominem attack, you are not very good at this are       >>>>> you Damon?       >>>>>       >>>>> /Flibble       >>>>       >>>> I think that he does this to attempt to mask his ignorance.       >>>>       >>>       >>> No, it is just the method that you both use to try to mask your lies.       >>>       >>>       >>> I point out your stupidity to help people understand where you are       >>> coming from so they don't try to find the logic in your illogical       >>> statements.       >>       >> Try not using any insults and only rely on correct reasoning.       >> When you do this your reasoning errors will be laid bare.       >>       >       > Only if you first promise to also stop calling people liars.       >       > Remember, YOU started it, and refused the offer of a cease-fire.       >       > You will need to get Fibber to agree to, or I will continue on him.              OK I will refrain from calling anyone a liar while       I see that this is mutually respected and there is       no evidence that the reply is in any way dishonest.              For example when I refer to DDD correctly emulated       by HHH I mean that one or more instructions of DDD       have been emulated by HHH according to the rules       of the x86 language. This does include HHH emulating       itself when the emulated DDD calls HHH(DDD).              If you change the subject to anything else then this       change of subject makes you a liar.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca