XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/28/2025 6:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 7/28/25 8:34 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >>   
   >> void DDD()   
   >> {   
   >>    HHH(DDD);   
   >>    return;   
   >> }   
   >>   
   >> That you are too stupid to understand that DDD simulated   
   >> by HHH does call HHH in recursive emulation even after   
   >> I have provided fully operational code of DDD calling   
   >> HHH(DDD) in recursive emulation *IS NOT A REBUTTAL*   
   >>   
   >> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c   
   >>   
   >   
   > What you are too stupid to understand is that while the *PROGRAM* HHH,   
   > which does the specific actions it is defined to, when it simulates the   
   > input that represents the *PROGRAM* DDD, which by definition includes   
   > the code of the HHH that it is built on, that will not reach the final   
   > state.   
   >   
      
   HHH correctly predicts that DDD correctly simulated   
   by HHH cannot possibly reach its simulated "return"   
   statement final halt state. This is because DDD does   
   call HHH(DDD) in recursive simulation.   
      
   *Within those exact words I am exactly correct*   
   Trying to change those *EXACT WORDS* to show that   
   I am incorrect *IS CHEATING*   
      
   After we have mutual agreement *ON THOSE EXACT WORDS*   
   thenn (then and only then) we can begin discussing   
   whether or not those words are relevant.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)