XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/29/2025 5:49 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:   
   > [ Followup-To: set ]   
   >   
   > In comp.theory olcott  wrote:   
   >> On 7/29/2025 2:39 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:   
   >   
   > [ .... ]   
   >   
   >>> As usual incorrect claims without evidence.   
   >>> Your dreams are no verified facts. HHH aborts before the simulation   
   >>> would reach the final halt state in a finite number of steps, as proven   
   >>> by world-class simulators using exactly the same input. The infinity is   
   >>> only in your dreams.   
   >   
   >   
   >> HHH(DDD) must simulate itself simulating DDD because DDD calls HHH(DDD)   
   >   
   >> HHH1(DDD) must NOT simulate itself simulating DDD because DDD DOES NOT   
   >> CALL HHH1(DDD)   
   >   
   >> At this point I think that you are a fucking liar.   
   >   
   > As has been established elsewhere in this thread, you are no position to   
   > call anybody else here a liar.  Glass house inhabitants, throwing stones,   
   > and all that.   
   >   
   > And you used to distinguish yourself from other cranks by sticking to   
   > decorous language, and generally being courteous.  Not any more.  That is   
   > a most unwelcome change.   
   >   
      
   void DDD()   
   {   
      HHH(DDD);   
      return;   
   }   
      
   *That not one single person here*   
   (besides those that I invited from the C groups)   
   acknowledges that DDD simulated by HHH specifies   
   recursive simulation   
      
   cannot be reasonably attributed to anything besides   
   willful deception.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)