XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/29/2025 9:35 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:   
   > olcott  wrote:   
   >> On 7/29/2025 5:49 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:   
   >>> In comp.theory olcott  wrote:   
   >>>> On 7/29/2025 2:39 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:   
   >   
   >>> [ .... ]   
   >   
   >>>>> As usual incorrect claims without evidence.   
   >>>>> Your dreams are no verified facts. HHH aborts before the simulation   
   >>>>> would reach the final halt state in a finite number of steps, as proven   
   >>>>> by world-class simulators using exactly the same input. The infinity is   
   >>>>> only in your dreams.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>> HHH(DDD) must simulate itself simulating DDD because DDD calls HHH(DDD)   
   >   
   >>>> HHH1(DDD) must NOT simulate itself simulating DDD because DDD DOES NOT   
   >>>> CALL HHH1(DDD)   
   >   
   >>>> At this point I think that you are a fucking liar.   
   >   
   >>> As has been established elsewhere in this thread, you are no position to   
   >>> call anybody else here a liar.  Glass house inhabitants, throwing stones,   
   >>> and all that.   
   >   
   >>> And you used to distinguish yourself from other cranks by sticking to   
   >>> decorous language, and generally being courteous.  Not any more.  That is   
   >>> a most unwelcome change.   
   >   
   >   
   >> void DDD()   
   >> {   
   >>    HHH(DDD);   
   >>    return;   
   >> }   
   >   
   >> *That not one single person here*   
   >> (besides those that I invited from the C groups)   
   >> acknowledges that DDD simulated by HHH specifies   
   >> recursive simulation   
   >   
   >> cannot be reasonably attributed to anything besides   
   >> willful deception.   
   >   
   > Foul mouthed lying on your part.  It can be attributed to your lack of   
   > self awareness and lack of technical ability.  Everybody here but you can   
   > see that.   
   >   
      
   It is not any lack of technical ability that determines   
   whether or not DDD correctly simulated by HHH can or   
   cannot reach its own "return" instruction final halt state.   
      
   Instead of addressing this you used the dishonest dodge   
   of ad hominem attack. It is for this exact same reason   
   that I am justified in calling out liars.   
      
   As soon as the first person utterly gives up dishonestly   
   trolling me and gives my work an actual fair review I   
   will treat that person with kindness and respect.   
      
   I tried kindness and respect for many years and the trolls   
   took this as weakness to be exploited.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)