XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/29/2025 8:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 7/29/25 7:52 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 7/29/2025 5:49 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:   
   >>> [ Followup-To: set ]   
   >>>   
   >>> In comp.theory olcott  wrote:   
   >>>> On 7/29/2025 2:39 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> [ .... ]   
   >>>   
   >>>>> As usual incorrect claims without evidence.   
   >>>>> Your dreams are no verified facts. HHH aborts before the simulation   
   >>>>> would reach the final halt state in a finite number of steps, as   
   >>>>> proven   
   >>>>> by world-class simulators using exactly the same input. The   
   >>>>> infinity is   
   >>>>> only in your dreams.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> HHH(DDD) must simulate itself simulating DDD because DDD calls HHH(DDD)   
   >>>   
   >>>> HHH1(DDD) must NOT simulate itself simulating DDD because DDD DOES NOT   
   >>>> CALL HHH1(DDD)   
   >>>   
   >>>> At this point I think that you are a fucking liar.   
   >>>   
   >>> As has been established elsewhere in this thread, you are no position to   
   >>> call anybody else here a liar.  Glass house inhabitants, throwing   
   >>> stones,   
   >>> and all that.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> It has never actually been established that I even   
   >> made one single material mistake in any of my claims.   
   >   
   > Sure it has, you are just proven to be too stupid to understand it.   
   >   
      
   This ad hominem The way that damned liar forms a rebuttal.   
      
   If you were not a damned liar you would have brought up   
   a concrete example of a material mistake that I made.   
   Because you are a damned liar you know that no such   
   mistake exists.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)