Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,722 of 59,235    |
|    wij to olcott    |
|    Re: I have just proven the error of all     |
|    31 Jul 25 00:14:40    |
      From: wyniijj5@gmail.com              On Wed, 2025-07-30 at 11:02 -0500, olcott wrote:       > On 7/30/2025 10:58 AM, wij wrote:       > > On Wed, 2025-07-30 at 10:43 -0500, olcott wrote:       > > > On 7/30/2025 10:23 AM, joes wrote:       > > > > Am Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:02:05 -0500 schrieb olcott:       > > > > > On 7/30/2025 5:59 AM, Richard Damon wrote:       > > > > > > On 7/29/25 11:12 PM, olcott wrote:       > > > >        > > > > > > > This just occurred to me:       > > > > > > > *HHH(DDD)==0 is also correct for another different reason*       > > > > > > > Even if we construed the HHH that DDD calls a part of the program       > > > > > > > under test it is true that neither the simulated DDD nor the       simulated       > > > > > > > HHH cannot possibly reach their own final halt state.       > > > > > > >        > > > > > > Sure they do, when correctly simulated. What doens't happne is       that the       > > > > > > PARTIAL simulation (and thus not correct) of HHH can't reach that       > > > > > > state.       > > > > > >        > > > > > We have been over this too many times. If DDD was incorrectly       emulated       > > > > > by HHH then you could show the exact x86 instruction of DDD that was       > > > > > emulated incorrectly when DDD is emulated by HHH or when DDD is       emulated       > > > > > by the emulated HHH.       > > >        > > > > Yeah, we have. The second call to HHH is not simulated.       > > > >        > > >        > > > I proved that the emulated HHH does emulate DDD correctly       > > > and you simply ignored this proof.       > >        > > You are shown not qualified to use 'prove' word and 'correct'. You have no       valid base.       > >        >        > That you cannot understand the sequence of steps that proves              I have proven you don't know even the basic IF/AND/OR logic. Do you want more?              > that DDD is correctly emulated by HHH and DDD is correctly       > emulated by an emulated HHH is not any actual rebuttal at all.       >        > _DDD()       > [0000219e] 55 push ebp       > [0000219f] 8bec mov ebp,esp       > [000021a1] 689e210000 push 0000219e       > [000021a6] e843f4ffff call 000015ee       > [000021ab] 83c404 add esp,+04       > [000021ae] 5d pop ebp       > [000021af] c3 ret       > Size in bytes:(0018) [000021af]       >        > _main()       > [000021be] 55 push ebp       > [000021bf] 8bec mov ebp,esp       > [000021c1] 689e210000 push 0000219e       > [000021c6] e823f4ffff call 000015ee       > [000021cb] 83c404 add esp,+04       > [000021ce] 50 push eax       > [000021cf] 685f070000 push 0000075f       > [000021d4] e8a5e5ffff call 0000077e       > [000021d9] 83c408 add esp,+08       > [000021dc] 33c0 xor eax,eax       > [000021de] 5d pop ebp       > [000021df] c3 ret       > Size in bytes:(0034) [000021df]       >        > machine stack stack machine assembly       > address address data code language       > ======== ======== ======== ========== =============       > [000021be][00103872][00000000] 55 push ebp       > [000021bf][00103872][00000000] 8bec mov ebp,esp       > [000021c1][0010386e][0000219e] 689e210000 push 0000219e // push DDD       > [000021c6][0010386a][000021cb] e823f4ffff call 000015ee // call HHH       > New slave_stack at:103916       >        > Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:11391e       > [0000219e][0011390e][00113912] 55 push ebp       > [0000219f][0011390e][00113912] 8bec mov ebp,esp       > [000021a1][0011390a][0000219e] 689e210000 push 0000219e // push DDD       > [000021a6][00113906][000021ab] e843f4ffff call 000015ee // call HHH       > New slave_stack at:14e33e       > [0000219e][0015e336][0015e33a] 55 push ebp       > [0000219f][0015e336][0015e33a] 8bec mov ebp,esp       > [000021a1][0015e332][0000219e] 689e210000 push 0000219e // push DDD       > [000021a6][0015e32e][000021ab] e843f4ffff call 000015ee // call HHH              Don't fool yourself, I would say you don't even understand hex-numbers.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca