XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/1/2025 11:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 8/1/25 11:44 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 8/1/2025 10:26 AM, joes wrote:   
   >>> Am Fri, 01 Aug 2025 10:12:35 -0500 schrieb olcott:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> If there is an actual *premature abort* then there is a specific point   
   >>>> in the execution trace where DDD correctly simulated by HHH stops   
   >>>> running without ever being aborted.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, after 12 instructions of DDD only or just before the third   
   >>> recursive simulation.   
   >>>   
   >> Everyone keeps dishonestly changing my words from   
   >> (a) DDD correctly simulated by HHH (can't possibly halt)   
   >   
   > No, it is that THIS HHH doesn't correctly simulate THIS DDD,   
   >   
      
   The outermost directly executed HHH does correctly   
   simulate N instructions of DDD and an instance of   
   itself in the same separate process context that it   
   created for DDD.   
      
   The correctly simulated instance of itself creates   
   yet another process context to simulate its own   
   instance of DDD.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)