Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,759 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Richard Damon    |
|    Re: Proof that DDD is correctly emulated    |
|    01 Aug 25 17:22:00    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 8/1/2025 5:01 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       > On 8/1/25 5:47 PM, olcott wrote:       >> On 8/1/2025 4:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>> On 8/1/25 5:08 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>> On 8/1/2025 3:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:       >>>>> On 8/1/25 4:33 PM, olcott wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> In other words neither Ĥ nor any human being       >>>>>> could possibly see the repeating sequence even       >>>>>> after it has repeated 100 million times?       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> Doesn't matter if is can determine what will happen, to correctly       >>>>> simulate the behavior, you have to do it.       >>>>>       >>>>       >>>> It seems that even after hundreds of corrections       >>>> you still do not understand that this infinite       >>>> sequence can be correctly detected in finite steps.       >>>>       >>>       >>> And you don't get that BY detecting that pattern, and putting that       >>> code into HHH, you put it into the code of the DDD that you are       >>> simulating, and it is no longer a non-halting pattern. It is only a       >>> non-hatling pattern if the HHH in the pattern will never abort its       >>> simulation.       >>>       >>       >> When you intentionally define halting as stops running       >> for any reason this would be correct.       >       > But I don't, as the only way that the PROGRAM/MACHINE CAN "stop running"       > is by reaching a final state.       >       > You can't "abort" or "shut down" a machine, only a simulation of it.       >              Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.∞       Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn       (a) Ĥ copies its input ⟨Ĥ⟩       (b) Ĥ invokes embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩       (c) embedded_H simulates ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩              Thus unless you want to be disagreeable at all       possible costs you would agree that ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩       simulated by embedded_H cannot possibly reach       its own simulated final state of ⟨Ĥ.qn⟩ no       matter what.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca