XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/3/2025 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:   
   > On 2025-08-02 13:33:04 +0000, olcott said:   
   >   
   >> On 8/2/2025 2:43 AM, Mikko wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> When you make a claim about "DDD simulated by HHH" you apparently   
   >>> don't know what the words mean. The DDD simulated by HHH is the   
   >>> same as DDD executed directly and it specifies the same behaviour   
   >>> no matter how you call it.   
   >>   
   >> Counter factual   
   >   
   > Appearances can be false or misleading. However, in absense of contrary   
   > information, being true is more likely.   
   >   
   There is no likely or unlikely to Boolean expressions.   
   there is only true or false.   
      
   _DDD()   
   [00002192] 55         push ebp   
   [00002193] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   
   [00002195] 6892210000 push 00002192  // push DDD   
   [0000219a] e833f4ffff call 000015d2  // call HHH   
   [0000219f] 83c404     add esp,+04   
   [000021a2] 5d         pop ebp   
   [000021a3] c3         ret   
   Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3]   
      
   When DDD is correctly emulated by HHH the definition   
   of the x86 language specifies that the correctly   
   emulated DDD cannot possibly ever reach past its own   
   machine address of [0000219a].   
      
   You can either comprehend this or fail to comprehend   
   this. Disagreement is inherently incorrect.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)