Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 57,867 of 59,235    |
|    dbush to olcott    |
|    Re: Some decision problems are only "und    |
|    13 Aug 25 21:45:50    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic       From: dbush.mobile@gmail.com              On 8/13/2025 9:40 PM, olcott wrote:       > How many tests that are black in color are entirely       > white in color and the answer must be a positive       > integer and must come with proof that it is correct.              Error: Assumes that something can be entirely black and entirely white              >       > What time is it (yes or no) ?              Error: Assumes that the answer can be yes or no              >       > Is this sentence true or false: "This sentence is not true" ?       > The above is the basis for the Tarski undefinability theorem.              Error: Assume that sentence can have a truth value              >       > What correct value can a halt decider return on an input       > that does the opposite of whatever the halt decider decides?              Error: Assumes that a halt decider exists              >       > The correct answer is that no such *INPUT* can possibly exist.       >                     Conclusion: When you assume something and encounter a contradiction,       that proves the assumption false.              All you're doing is showing that you don't understand proof by       contradiction, a concept taught to and understood by high school       students more than 50 years your junior.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca