XPost: sci.logic, comp.theory   
   From: rjh@cpax.org.uk   
      
   On 02/10/2025 19:10, olcott wrote:   
   > On 10/2/2025 12:48 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >> On 2025-10-02, olcott  wrote:   
   >>> On 10/2/2025 11:43 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-10-02, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>> The science of correct reasoning certainly requires   
   >>>>> epistemology, otherwise most human knowledge cannot   
   >>>>> be reasoned about.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The science of anything requires a researcher who is humble,   
   >>>> and who   
   >>>> makes the utmost effort to look for reasons why their   
   >>>> hypotheses might   
   >>>> be incorrect, rather than only looking for affirming   
   >>>> evidence, rejecting   
   >>>> all else.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I have spent 22 years on this.   
   >>   
   >> 22 years of not humbly looking for ways you might be wrong.   
   >>   
   >   
   > 22 years of using categorically exhaustive reasoning   
   > (that eliminate all gaps in reasoning) to reverse-engineer   
   > the foundation of all analytical truth.   
      
   Which amounts to 22 years of not humbly looking for ways you   
   might be wrong. So you agree with Kaz. Good!   
      
      
      
   > When you always think inside-the-box then like on   
   > Stack Exchange all new ideas are rejected entirely   
   > on the basis that they do not exactly correspond   
   > to existing ideas.   
      
   WHAT new idea? All you've managed to communicate in your 22 years   
   of assuming you don't make mistakes is that you don't understand   
   the Halting Problem, you're a bit wobbly on C, you don't get   
   isomorphism, and... oh! We must not overlook your prize   
   announcement, must we? "I am an actual genius." P Olcott,   
   comp.theory, 28 September 2025.   
      
   You have yet to communicate *anything* that is both new and   
   correct. You claim that it's *all* correct, but your work is   
   riddled with errors, and dozens of these errors have been pointed   
   out to you, but you have arrogantly ignored almost all of them,   
   instead choosing to insult your critics, presumably in the hop   
   that they'll learn that correcting you comes at a cost.   
      
   AND YET they keep finding errors with practically everything you   
   post.   
      
   You don't have a new idea. You don't have spit.   
      
   --   
   Richard Heathfield   
   Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk   
   "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999   
   Sig line 4 vacant - apply within   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)