XPost: sci.logic, comp.theory   
   From: 643-408-1753@kylheku.com   
      
   On 2025-10-02, olcott  wrote:   
   > On 10/2/2025 12:48 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >> On 2025-10-02, olcott  wrote:   
   >>> I have spent 22 years on this.   
   >>   
   >> 22 years of not humbly looking for ways you might be wrong.   
   >>   
   >   
   > 22 years of using categorically exhaustive reasoning   
   > (that eliminate all gaps in reasoning) to reverse-engineer   
   > the foundation of all analytical truth.   
      
   If it takes you 22 years to think you have eliminated gaps in your   
   reasoning about something very simple that undergraduates "get" in one   
   or two lectures, don't you think maybe that's a red flag?!   
      
   >> There is your problem. The scientific method is not simply a   
   >> personal characteristic.   
   >>   
   >   
   > This says it all regarding the Liar Paradox,   
      
   The Liar Paradox points to its own syntax and claims that it is a   
   falsehood. It refers to nothing external; and no point of view can   
   pin down its truth value.   
      
   The Halting question refers to something outside of itself, for which   
   there is always a right answer.   
      
   It would really behoove you to quit harping about the Liar Paradox   
   already.   
      
   It's really just something for entertaining children, not befitting   
   of eudite dialog among intellectuals.   
      
   --   
   TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr   
   Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal   
   Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)