XPost: sci.logic, comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/2/2025 1:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:   
   > On 02/10/2025 19:10, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 10/2/2025 12:48 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-10-02, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>> On 10/2/2025 11:43 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2025-10-02, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>>> The science of correct reasoning certainly requires   
   >>>>>> epistemology, otherwise most human knowledge cannot   
   >>>>>> be reasoned about.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The science of anything requires a researcher who is humble, and who   
   >>>>> makes the utmost effort to look for reasons why their hypotheses might   
   >>>>> be incorrect, rather than only looking for affirming evidence,   
   >>>>> rejecting   
   >>>>> all else.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I have spent 22 years on this.   
   >>>   
   >>> 22 years of not humbly looking for ways you might be wrong.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> 22 years of using categorically exhaustive reasoning   
   >> (that eliminate all gaps in reasoning) to reverse-engineer   
   >> the foundation of all analytical truth.   
   >   
   > Which amounts to 22 years of not humbly looking for ways you might be   
   > wrong. So you agree with Kaz. Good!   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >> When you always think inside-the-box then like on   
   >> Stack Exchange all new ideas are rejected entirely   
   >> on the basis that they do not exactly correspond   
   >> to existing ideas.   
   >   
   > WHAT new idea?   
   *My whole grand opus is proven right here by is coherence*   
   https://claude.ai/share/45d3ca9c-fa9a-4a02-9e22-c6acd0057275   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)