XPost: sci.logic, comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/2/2025 2:42 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:   
   > On 02/10/2025 20:15, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 10/2/2025 1:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> WHAT new idea?   
   >> *My whole grand opus is proven right here by is coherence*   
   >> https://claude.ai/share/45d3ca9c-fa9a-4a02-9e22-c6acd0057275   
   >   
   > An LLM replies:   
      
   If you meant that you spoke with the same LLM   
   at the same point in the conversation you would   
   not say it that way.   
      
   > --------------------------------------------------------   
   > The first logic error is the sentence:   
   > "So the simple prolog finally resolved the liar paradox as not a bearer   
   > of truth."   
   >   
   > Why it's an error: the claim contradicts the author’s earlier correct   
   > concession that the Prolog example does not prove the philosophical   
   > point. Rejecting a syntactic construction via an occurs-check is a   
   > computational diagnostics move, not a philosophical proof that the   
   > natural-language Liar lacks truth-value. The sentence conflates a model-   
   > level implementation decision with a settled metaphysical conclusion.   
   > --------------------------------------------------------   
   >   
   > Don't bother replying here if you don't want to. You can take it up   
   > directly with an LLM.   
   >   
      
   *You are cheating in the same way*   
      
   If you want to not cheat then talk to this   
   LLM at this point in the conversation.   
      
   https://claude.ai/share/45d3ca9c-fa9a-4a02-9e22-c6acd0057275   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)