Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 58,011 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to All    |
|    Claude AI found a key ambiguity in the w    |
|    10 Oct 25 12:39:51    |
   
   XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   This may finally justify Ben's Objection   
      
      
    If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its   
    input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D   
    would never stop running unless aborted then   
      
    H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D   
    specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.   
      
      
   I certainly will not quote professor Sipser on this change   
   unless and until he agrees to it.   
      
    H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report   
    that [its simulated] D specifies a non-halting sequence   
    of configurations.   
      
   Because the whole paragraph is within the context of   
   simulating halt decider H and its simulated input D it   
   seems unreasonable yet possible to interpret the last   
   D as a directly executed D.   
      
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca