home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.ai.philosophy      Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this      59,235 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 58,098 of 59,235   
   dbush to olcott   
   Re: Never any actual rebuttal to HHH(DD)   
   22 Oct 25 13:36:19   
   
   XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: dbush.mobile@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/22/2025 11:47 AM, olcott wrote:   
   > On 10/22/2025 10:40 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >> On 2025-10-22, olcott  wrote:   
   >>> On 10/20/2025 10:20 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>>> And when I identify a flaw yo simply ignore   
   >>>>> whatever I say.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Nope; all the ways you say claim you've identified a flaw have been   
   >>>> dissected by multiple poeple to a much greater detail than they   
   >>>> deserve.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It is disingenuous to say that you've simply had your details ignored.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Turing machines in general can only compute mappings   
   >>> from their inputs. The halting problem requires computing   
   >>> mappings that in some cases are not provided in the   
   >>> inputs therefore the halting problem is wrong.   
   >>   
   >> The halting problem positively does not propose anything   
   >> like that, which would be gapingly wrong.   
   >>   
   >   
   > It only seems that way because you are unable to   
   > provide the actual mapping that the actual input   
   > to HHH(DD) specifies when DD is simulated by HHH   
   > according to the semantics of the C language,   
      
   Then you have no mapping since DD is NOT simulated by HHH according to   
   the semantics of the C language because HHH aborts.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca