XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/26/2025 11:47 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   > On 2025-10-27, olcott  wrote:   
   >> On 10/26/2025 9:15 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-10-26 19:58, olcott wrote:   
   >>>> On 10/26/2025 8:50 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And   
   >>>> *Kaz is now dishonored in his deceit*   
   >>>   
   >>> How the hell is that a response to the word 'And'? At least quote enough   
   >>> material that its apparent what you are responding to.   
   >>>   
   >>> André   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> He is trying to get away with spamming me with   
   >> deceit so I erase all of it and keep ridiculing   
   >   
   > Aha!   
   >   
   > So you finally appreciate how it looks like spamming when you are on the   
   > receiving end of these god-forsaken x86utm execution traces!   
   >   
   > You pathetic sack of shit, unable to respond to /code/!   
   >   
      
   Here is the code   
      
   A straight forward sequence of steps that any   
   C programmer can easily determine:   
      
   int DD()   
   {   
      int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);   
      if (Halt_Status)   
        HERE: goto HERE;   
      return Halt_Status;   
   }   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
      
   > Calling people dishonest while dodging findings from an independent   
   > third party review of your apparatus.   
   >   
      
   The crux of everything that can be said about   
   HHH(DD) is summed up in the above 15 lines.   
      
   > You are a disgrace to STEM.   
   >   
      
   I am not the one dishonestly dodging the single   
   point that sums up most all of my work.   
      
   > Your HHH is lousy; it says that DDD is non termninating, when   
   > DDD is this non-diagonal case:  void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; }.   
   >   
      
   I am only talking about the HHH in the fifteen   
   lines of text immediately above.   
      
   > HHH(DDD) can return 1; why doesn't it?   
   >   
   >   
      
   That HHH does not even say what it returns.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)