XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   I am only referring to the mental execution trace   
   of D simulated by H performing this trace in C as   
   specified below.   
      
   Any attempt to diverge from this will be called   
   out as the strawman deception.   
      
   int D()   
   {   
      int Halt_Status = H(D);   
      if (Halt_Status)   
        HERE: goto HERE;   
      return Halt_Status;   
   }   
      
   Here are the precise words of my claim that I spent   
   several months perfecting on the basis of feedback.   
   I mean these words 100% exactly and precisely as   
   stated.   
      
   D simulated by H according to the semantics of C   
   programming language (until H sees the repeating   
   pattern) does enable H to report that its simulated   
   input cannot possibly reach its own simulated   
   "return" statement final halt state.   
   *H is a correct termination analyzer for D*   
      
   For the last three years every single review of my   
   work by dozens and dozens of people always replaced   
   the words that I actually said with different words   
   and formed their rebuttal on that basis.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)