XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: 643-408-1753@kylheku.com   
      
   On 2025-11-13, olcott  wrote:   
   > On 11/13/2025 2:44 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>> Your code essentially claims that infinite recursion   
   >>> stops when you monkey with it.   
      
   By the way, it is mostly your code, and someone elses x86utm.   
      
   >> You're welcome to point of what exactly you mean by "monkey" and which   
   >> lines of code are doing that.   
   >   
   > Once D simulated by H correctly matches its correct   
   > non-halting behavior pattern doing anything besides   
   > aborting the simulation and rejecting the input is cheating.   
      
   Essentially, as the Crowned King of Halting, you are just /decreeing/ an   
   edict making it illegal to gather evidence as to whether H made the   
   correct decision. Evidence such as looking at the bits H left behind to   
   see whether they really comprise the state of non-terminating   
   simulation.   
      
   And you think that is how you conduct CS research; like that's how it   
   works in academia?   
      
   Moreover, you bemoan people who are "closed-minded" and cling to   
   "conventional wisdom" by which they assume you are wrong; yet if those   
   people just accepted arbitrary rules about what they may or may not   
   investigate, to avoid producing results displeasing to the King,   
   then they are fine intellectuals.   
      
   I don't see what remaining conversation is to be had here.   
      
   --   
   TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr   
   Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal   
   Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)