XPost: comp.theory
From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com
On 11/15/2025 2:08 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On 2025-11-15, olcott wrote:
>> On 11/15/2025 3:33 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>>> On 2025-11-15, olcott wrote:
>>>> You already admitted that D simulated by H
>>>> cannot possibly reach its own final halt state.
>>>
>>> The full limit of my observation is this: the /simulation/ conducted by
>>> H, of D, is not conducted far enough to reproduce the situation where D
>>> returns. That's the most exact wording, no more no less.
>>>
>>
>> That is a damned lie.
>
> So you are sayiing that the simulation conduced by H, of D,
> /is/ conducted far enough to reproduce the situation where D
> returns?
>
> When D is the diagonal D, we are not observing that, right?
>
> *Headscratch*
>
>> When I said damned I mean that
>> you might actually be condemned to actual Hell.
>> The whole purpose of my 28 year long primary research
>> was to show how "true on the basis of meaning" can be
>> made computable.
>
> True is not based on meaning. Primary truth are based on
> a correspondence between propositions and the state of
> the world that those propostions are about.
>
> After that, it's all logical operators combining
> them together, hopefully in ways that preserve truths.
>
>> So while you may think that your lies are mere trollish
>> fun if the planet is killed off in part because of your
>> lies their may be actual Hell toupee.
>
> That's weapons-grade crazy. If you dohn't agree with a lunatic who
> thinks the halting problem in math/CS is wrong, you are helping destroy
> the planet.
>
> Seriously, pause to listen to yourself for a moment.
>
Loony Tunes with a rather odd brain disorder?...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
