XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/26/2025 3:47 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   > On 2025-11-26, dbush  wrote:   
   >> On 11/26/2025 2:55 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>> On 11/26/2025 12:35 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>> On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>> In other words you are trying to get away with   
   >>>>> disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language   
   >>>>> or the semantics of the C programing language.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Says the pitiful twit who has no meaningful response to results shown   
   >>>> with code.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> I am not the one that came up with the jackass idea   
   >>> of restarting a simulation after it has already   
   >>> conclusively proved that it cannot possibly halt.   
   >>   
   >> That the continuation of the simulation reaches a final halting state   
   >> conclusively proves otherwise.   
   >   
   > And Olcott has no idea how to fix it and is no longer   
   > able to engage with tasks involving code.   
   >   
      
   void Infinite_Loop()   
   {   
      HERE: goto HERE;   
      return;   
   }   
      
   And the continuation of the simulation   
   at the "return" statement "proves"   
   by deception that infinite loops halt.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make   
   "true on the basis of meaning" computable.   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation   
   for correct reasoning.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)