XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: 643-408-1753@kylheku.com   
      
   On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   > On 11/26/2025 3:47 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >> On 2025-11-26, dbush  wrote:   
   >>> On 11/26/2025 2:55 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>> On 11/26/2025 12:35 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2025-11-26, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>>> In other words you are trying to get away with   
   >>>>>> disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language   
   >>>>>> or the semantics of the C programing language.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Says the pitiful twit who has no meaningful response to results shown   
   >>>>> with code.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I am not the one that came up with the jackass idea   
   >>>> of restarting a simulation after it has already   
   >>>> conclusively proved that it cannot possibly halt.   
   >>>   
   >>> That the continuation of the simulation reaches a final halting state   
   >>> conclusively proves otherwise.   
   >>   
   >> And Olcott has no idea how to fix it and is no longer   
   >> able to engage with tasks involving code.   
   >>   
   >   
   > void Infinite_Loop()   
   > {   
   >    HERE: goto HERE;   
   >    return;   
   > }   
   >   
   > And the continuation of the simulation   
   > at the "return" statement "proves"   
   > by deception that infinite loops halt.   
      
   I have no idea what you are blabbing about, and neither do you.   
      
   --   
   TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr   
   Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal   
   Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)