[continued from previous message]   
      
   and for Sartre, for example, for the 20'th century, to help   
   put down Sowa and typical Tarski-ans, instead of stand them up.   
      
   Then, a _stronger_ logicist positivism arrives   
   after a _stronger_ mathematical platonism.   
      
   Set theory isn't the only theory of one relation -   
   then though that equi-interpretability of fundamental   
   theories makes for quite a thorough account.   
      
      
   Before you've said things that wouldn't contradict your   
   own account here, so, at least there's a sort of parallel   
   program so that nobody needs Montague when there's Herbrand,   
   and nobody needs quasi-modal logic except as an example of fallacy.   
      
      
      
   An old foundation for correct reasoning, ....   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)