Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 58,677 of 59,235    |
|    olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
|    The most definitive measure of the behav    |
|    16 Dec 25 11:21:18    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 12/16/2025 2:39 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       > On 15/12/2025 23:23, polcott wrote:       >> They are not going to know the nuances of context       >> dependent execution. Everyone here denies that it       >> exists when I have proven it beyond all possible       >> doubt thousands of times.       >       > It's literally in Turing's paper. He calls them c-machines (choice       > machines). One of the state-transitions takes context from outside the       > machine.       >              It is a verified fact that HHH(DD)==0 and HHH1(DD)==1       are both correct when              (a) TMs only transform input finite strings to values              (b) There exists no alternative more definitive measure       of the behavior that the input to H(P) specifies (within       finite string transformation rules) than P simulated by H.              --       Copyright 2025 Olcott |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca