XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/21/2025 5:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:   
   > On 12/21/25 6:19 PM, olcott wrote:   
   >> On 6/12/2024 11:50 AM, olcott wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> When we compute the mapping from the input to H(D,D) this   
   >>> must apply a set of finite string transformation rules   
   >>> (specified by the semantics of the x86 language) to this input.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> The above is my first use applying this term to a halt decider.   
   >>   
   >> My first documented use of the term   
   >> "finite string transformation rules"   
   >> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/TFXhleKnHmY/m/lqhDVnvUBgAJ   
   >>   
   >> *This is the basis for my unique definition of a generic decider*   
   >>   
   >> Deciders: Transform finite string inputs by finite   
   >> string transformation rules into {Accept, Reject} values.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > And is just wrong.   
   >   
   > For instance, a RASP based decider uses no strings, but might use a   
   > numeric representatio of a string.   
   >   
      
   That may be an actual exception yet over-complicates   
   the essence that I need to convey.   
      
   > And in the more generic version of the theory, are not restricted to   
   > just Accepting or Rejecting the input.   
   >   
      
   Decider seems to be limited to deciding.   
      
   > Sorry, you are asking people to confirm things that are not actually   
   > true in the way you think.   
   >   
   > It seems you stumbled upon a partially true statement (true in some   
   > versions of the system) but are focused on a part that is not an actual   
   > basis.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)