XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/22/2025 9:22 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:   
   > Am 21.12.2025 um 23:36 schrieb olcott:   
   >> On 12/21/2025 12:34 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:   
   >>> Am 21.12.2025 um 15:37 schrieb olcott:   
   >>>> Deciders: Transform finite string inputs by finite string   
   >>>> transformation rules into {Accept, Reject} values.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> When there are no finite string transformation rules that   
   >>>> transform the input finite string into {Accept, Reject} values   
   >>>> the conventional view is that the input is undecidable.   
   >>>>   
   >>> That's all for the ivory tower you do.   
   >>> Have you ever done any real programming ?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Decades.   
   >>   
   >> My post recent.   
   >> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm   
   >>   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPOESS   
   >> I was the C++ programmer for Satellite ingest.   
   >>   
   >> A couple of years of this   
   >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ObjectARX   
   >>   
   > Sorry, that's the same ivory tower issue.   
   > Do you have experience with a larger commercial project ?   
   >   
      
   Satellite ingest is not ivory tower.   
   AutoCAD is not ivory tower.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)