[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> transformation, it was correct and you ADMIT you have LIED.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Transform finite string   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   >   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   >   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   > inputs   
   >   
   > by finite string transformation rules into   
   > {Accept, Reject} values.   
      
   Right, which I showed, but apparently due to your ignorance, you can't   
   understand.   
      
   The same string given to differnet machines are the same input with the   
   same meaning.   
      
   I guess you don't understand that fact of language because of your   
   stupidity.   
      
   >   
   >> If you try to claim I haven't shown this, you are just a liar, as you   
   >> just intentionally trimed of that explaination and accepted it without   
   >> comment.   
   >>   
   >> Sorry, you are annalated your credibility and your reputation.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)