Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.ai.philosophy    |    Perhaps we should ask SkyNet about this    |    59,235 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 58,835 of 59,235    |
|    Tristan Wibberley to olcott    |
|    Re: By what process can we trust the ana    |
|    27 Dec 25 04:50:37    |
      XPost: comp.theory, sci.logic, sci.math       From: tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk              On 27/12/2025 03:19, olcott wrote:       > Whenever it can be verified that correct semantic       > entailment is applied to the semantic meaning of       > expressions of language then what-so-ever conclusion       > is derived is a necessary consequence of this       > expression of language.              "the" applied to a continuum. How do you trust a system that does such a       verification? It's related to LLMs so closely itself.              --       Tristan Wibberley              The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except       citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca