[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>> It can not handle most systems with a countably infinite domain of   
   >>>>> regard, so not Natural Numbers, not Finite Strings, not Turing   
   >>>>> Complete Systems.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It can handle them at least to the same extent   
   >>>> as humans minds. Algorithmic compression.   
   >>>   
   >>> NOPE, As if it could handle Natural Numbers, then we could create the   
   >>> G for the system, and it couldn't prove it.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> It is merely that diagonalization hides the semantic   
   >> incoherence that reject's G.   
   >   
   > Nope. It seems you don't understand that G is just a statement that no   
   > number statisfies a specific (complicated) Primitive Recursive   
   > Relationship. A Relationship that can ALWAYS, for ANY number, be   
   > evaluated in finite time.   
   >   
      
   "that no number satisfies a specific (complicated) Primitive   
   Recursive Relationship" How is this shown?   
      
   > There is no "diagonalization" in G. You are confusing different proof.   
   >   
   > The question of G is a pure mathematical question, either a number does   
   > or does not satisfy it.   
   >   
   > In other words, your "logic" says some questions with factual answers   
   > are just wrong.   
   >   
   > In other words, your logic is proven to be self-inconsistant, as   
   > statements provably true are considered to be illogical.   
   >   
      
   You know that the Liar Paradox: "This sentence is not true"   
   is not a truth bearer. None-the-less when we add one level   
   of indirect reference   
   This sentence is not true: "This sentence is not true"   
   it becomes true.   
      
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott

   
      
   My 28 year goal has been to make 
   
   "true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"
   
   reliably computable.

   
      
   This required establishing a new foundation
   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)